Before submission

Grant proposal review checklist

A grant proposal review checklist should catch the errors that polished writing can hide.

Use this before external review, advisor review or final portal upload.

Final review checks

AreaReview questionPass signal
FitDoes every answer map to the call objective?No off-topic company story
EligibilityCan the reviewer find the eligibility proof?Applicant and call fit are visible
EvidenceDoes each claim have proof?Specific evidence appears near the claim
Work planAre activities, owners and outputs clear?No orphan task
BudgetDoes every cost connect to work?Budget and work plan agree
AttachmentsAre names, dates and versions final?Files match portal requirements
PortalIs submission access tested?No last-day account surprise

Review roles

Eligibility reviewer

Reads only rules, applicant fit, consortium rules and documents.

Open

Budget reviewer

Checks cost categories, match funding and work-package links.

Open

Narrative reviewer

Reads for clarity, evidence and evaluator questions.

Open

Submission owner

Controls portal access, final file names and upload timing.

Open

Stop signs

  • The final draft still says what the company does more than what the funded work will do.
  • Budget numbers changed after narrative review.
  • Partner letters or attachments are not final.
  • The team cannot explain the work in one sentence.

Questions

Who should review a grant proposal?

Use at least one reviewer who did not write the draft. Separate eligibility, budget and narrative review when the application is large.

When should review start?

Review should start when a full rough draft exists, not after the final deadline week begins.

Use Yellow Grant before you write

Check fit, timing, budget and evidence before a grant application takes time away from customers, product work or fundraising.